Rate control mix support
- arniemansell
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
TPL_KUNENA_MESSAGE_REPLIED_NEW Rate control mix support
15 May 2013 21:46
Raf + PW
I went and tried the second method again and it worked a treat. Must have been finger trouble before. That looks like it is the true solution I've been looking for.
Time wasn't waisted though - I now know all about logical switches too
Many thanks,
A
I went and tried the second method again and it worked a treat. Must have been finger trouble before. That looks like it is the true solution I've been looking for.
Time wasn't waisted though - I now know all about logical switches too
Many thanks,
A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PW
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 9909
- Thank you received: 3910
TPL_KUNENA_MESSAGE_REPLIED_NEW Rate control mix support
16 May 2013 06:17 - 16 May 2013 06:18
Hi,
so you learned a lot about the Jeti TX

Have fun with this great radio.
Regards
PW
so you learned a lot about the Jeti TX
Have fun with this great radio.
Regards
PW
Rechtsbeistand u.a. bei "Modellflugproblemen"etc. : Rechtsanwälte Wessels & Partner, Tel.: 02362/27065
PW Modellbautechnik ( Jeti Kombiangebote, Beratung/Einstellservice etc.)
PW Modellbautechnik ( Jeti Kombiangebote, Beratung/Einstellservice etc.)
Last edit: 16 May 2013 06:18 by PW.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- arniemansell
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
TPL_KUNENA_MESSAGE_REPLIED_NEW Rate control mix support
04 Jun 2013 20:27
Just to follow up on this thread now that I've used it in anger.
In the end I preferred the solution based on a sequence of logical switches, the reason being that it allows the reduction in rudder rate to be set as a percentage regardless of any exponential or dual rates that may or may not be switched in.
It works better with the logical switches arranged so that, for example, as the throttle is opened from idle:
All switches off
L1 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L1 and L2 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5%)
L1 and L2 and L3 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5% + 5%)
etc.
The reason for this is that delay can be added to smooth the transitions somewhat. But if the switches are arranged:
All switches off
L1 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L2 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -55%
L3 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -60%
etc.
the delay function causes some very strange behaviour at transitions.
Cheers,
A
In the end I preferred the solution based on a sequence of logical switches, the reason being that it allows the reduction in rudder rate to be set as a percentage regardless of any exponential or dual rates that may or may not be switched in.
It works better with the logical switches arranged so that, for example, as the throttle is opened from idle:
All switches off
L1 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L1 and L2 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5%)
L1 and L2 and L3 on, rudder mixed with rudder at -(50% + 5% + 5%)
etc.
The reason for this is that delay can be added to smooth the transitions somewhat. But if the switches are arranged:
All switches off
L1 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -50%
L2 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -55%
L3 on only, rudder mixed with rudder at -60%
etc.
the delay function causes some very strange behaviour at transitions.
Cheers,
A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.313 seconds